Answer: The response options are wrong, those that correspond according to what I found on the internet are:
All of the following are necessary to calculate the total purchase price for a Municipal bond traded on a yield basis in the secondary market EXCEPT:
A. Coupon rate
B. Yield to Maturity
C. Dated date
D. Trade date
<u>The correct answer is "C. Dated date".</u>
<u>Option "C" is correct because to calculate the price of a bond it is not necessary the day of issuance of the bond, is enough with its YIELD TO MATURITY, RATE CUPON AND YEARS TO MATURITY.</u>
Answer: <em>No, since the value of the cash flows over the first two years are less than the initial investment</em>
Explanation:
value of cash flows for the first two years = $48,000 (24,000x2)
Initial Investment = $50000
Because the additional $48,000 profit during the two year payback is not grater than the $50,000 purchase, they should not put the large neon sign up.
Answer: 12.86 years.
Explanation: Rule of 72 says that to know in how many years the amount can double can be done by using the interest rate. The rule of 72 says that 72 divided by the annual interest rate will give the number of years it will take to double the amount.
Rule of 72:
Rate of interest = 5.60%/4
Number of years to double the investment = 72 ÷ 1.4
Number of years to double the investment = 51.43/4 = 12.86 years
Therefore, it will take 12.86 years for the $1850 to get double to $3700.
Answer:
$11,200
Explanation:
As not mentioned in the account. It is Assumed that the Larry and Bird are related parties and Bird made a sale at a transfer price of $40,000 with $24,000 cost of inventory.
Bird can only recognize the equity up to the ratio of inventory used or sold by the related party.
As 30% was not consumed then consumption will be 70%, so 70% of the income is realized and it will be recorded.
Equity Income = $40,000 - $24,000 = $16,000
Realized Equity income = $16,000 x 70% = $11,200
* There is some ambiguity in the question given.
Stephen should be more concerned with the shareholder management theory and Karishma should be more concerned with the stakeholder management theory.
The following information should be considered:
For shareholder:
- It is the owners of the company,
- It could be equity or preference shareholder.
- It should be considered when they are limited by shares.
For stakeholder:
- They are not the owners but have an interest in the company.
- Each company contains the stakeholder.
- It includes the creditors, government, etc.
- It should be considered for the performance of the company.
Therefore we can conclude that Stephen should be more concerned with the shareholder management theory and Karishma should be more concerned with the stakeholder management theory.
Learn more about the management here: brainly.com/question/14874943
