Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50
Answer:
option (C) $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Nominal exchange rate, E = 0.80 euros per dollar
Real exchange rate = 
Now,
Real exchange rate = [ Price of good in US ] ÷ [ Price of Good in Italy ]
= 
Here,
PU = Price of US in dollars
PI = Price of Italy in Euros
Thus,
Real exchange in rate
= 
or
= 
hence,
we get
Ratio of Price of a good in US to Price of a Good in Italy =
or
we can say $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
option (C) $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
<span>A.impulse
Hope this helps.</span>
In traditional savings account, you can withdraw money whenever you need it without a financial penalty. In online savings account, link to traditional or online checking accounts and you enter your banks routing number and account number on the application. You can also transfer money between linked accounts with online savings. (hope this helps:)
Answer:
d. 3.85 trillion
Explanation:
Step 1: Given data
GDP = GDP grew by = 4% = 0.04
R = inflation rate was = 2.5% = 0.025
D = government budget deficit was = $250 billion
Step 2: Formula
X = debt at the start of last year
X = D / (GDP + R)
Step 3: Computation
X = 250 billion / (0.04 + 0.025)
X = 250,000,000,000 / 0.065
X = 3,846,153,846,153.85
Step 4: Convert to trillion
X = 3,846,153,846,153.85 / 1,000,000,000,000
X = 3.85 trillion
The correct option is d. 3.85 trillion
Hope this helps!
