The overdraft fee is the fee that John was charged on his checking account.
<h3>What is an overdraft fee?</h3>
This is a fee that has to be paid due to the fact that a payment has been authorized.
The overdraft fee is usually paid to cover transactions if there are not enough funds in the account.
<h3>The checking account</h3>
This is a current account that lets deposit and easily withdraw for the sake of transactions.
Read more on the overdraft fee here: brainly.com/question/25532516
Answer: No. It does not violate Title VII if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Cynthia, requested a two-week leave from her employer to go on a religious pilgrimage and that the pilgrimage was not a requirement of her religion, but Cynthia felt it was a calling from God.
Based on the scenario, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave. According to the court, when an employee says that based on his or her religious belief, he or she is required to go to a pilgrimage, the person has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
In this case, her church which is the Roman Catholic didn't call for a pilgrimage as it was her personal choice. Therefore, Title VII is not violated if Cynthia's employer does not grant her the leave.
Answer:
(A) Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
Explanation:
Shawn renounce to less goods than Sue when producing donuts.
This meas, Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts as their cost from the economic point of view are lower.
This do not imply that Sue cannot outproduce Shawn, it means it cost her more than Shawn
For example, if Sue produce 10 Donuts, but to produce donuts resing to produce 20 of other goods, each donut has an opportunity cost of 2
While Shawn can produce 8 donuts and resing to produce 8 of other goods:
each donut has an opportunity cost of 1
Therefore, is better for the overall economy to Shawn produce donuts and trade with Sue for the other good.
Answer: conducted substantial business with Ohio residents through the Web site.
Explanation: The sliding - scale standard confirms when exercising jurisdiction over an out of state defendant is allowed. It is only allowed when significant business has been conducted by this out of state company over the Internet with another state. In this case the out of state defendant is Trading Post, a Washington company, and it has dealt in transactions over the Internet with the state of Ohio via its website. Because the business conducted in Ohio is significant, it gives Robert the grounds to sue Trading Post, even though Trading Post is not based in the same state as Robert.
Answer:
High-tech firms are hiring expensive, sophisticated people who are in high demand compared to fast food franchises and treat them better to avoid losing them to other companies
Explanation:
High-tech firms are hiring expensive, sophisticated people who are in high demand. This brings about a better treatment of their employees because if they do not offer these amenities to employees, they would become employees of other high-tech companies. Individuals with low skill levels do not get high salaries or benefits. They are not in as high demand as highly skilled workers. It is efficient, but many would argue that it is not fair.