Answer:
The $300 of out of pocket expense exceeds the MSRB political contribution limit and will result in the municipal securities firm being banned as an underwriter for that issuer for 2 years.
Explanation:
The municipal securities firm is is underwriter for municipal issuer. The volunteers have paid $300 out of pocket but they are not entitled to make contribution to the campaign. This will result the firm being banned for two years as an underwriter for the issuer.
Answer: A. As Expenses
B. No treatment.
Explanation:
A. The $100,000 was not structured and a loan so it will be accounted for as EXPENSES. This means that it will be deducted from the Income for the year from Calhoun's books.
B. A C Corporation is by definition taxed SEPARATELY from it's owners in the United States of America. Seeing as both Corporations were C Corporations, Jonathan as the owner of both companies need not worry about how he should treat the $100,000 payment as he will not ne taxed on it.
Answer:
The investigating areas should be field, processing units and finished goods inventory.
Explanation:
The business units should be considered for quality control. The quality of the product is the main cause of concern for any business. When the poor quality products are processed customers will move away from the business. Total Quality Management or TQM approach is used to make the products best fit.
Answer:
22.33 m
Explanation:
We are given;
Coefficient of kinetic friction between the puck and floor; μ = 0.5
initial speed of the puck; u = 14.8m/s
From Newton's equation of motion, we know that;
v² = u² + 2as
But since it decelerate to rest, the acceleration will be negative.
Thus;
v² = u² - 2as
Final velocity is zero, thus;
0 = u² - 2as
Thus, a = u²/2s
Where s is the distance covered before coming to rest.
Now, we know that formula for the frictional force is;
F = μmg
F/m = μg
We also know that F/m = a
Thus, a = μg
Thus:
u²/2s = μg
s = u²/(2μg)
s = 14.8²/(2 × 0.5 × 9.81)
s = 22.33 m
Answer: Normal good
Explanation:
A normal good is a good that has a positive correlation between its income and demand. This means that for a normal good, an increase in income will lead to an increase in the demand for the good while a reduction in income will also lead to a reduction in the demand for the good.
Cassandra bought 16 clothes when her income was $40000 but when her income reduced to $35000, she bought less of the good. That means that the cotton blouses bought by Cassandra are normal good.
