1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tema [17]
3 years ago
5

Which of the follwoing BEST explains why the decision made in Dred Scott v. Sanford nullified the Compromise of 1850 and popular

sovereignty?
A.
It defined slaves as property that could not be legally taken by the government

B.
It granted the Supreme Court the power to abolish slavery and denied it to Congress

C.
It granted states the right to secede if the federal government violated the Constitution

D.
It held that African-Americans could not be citizens and therefore could not vote
History
1 answer:
Anit [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A)  It defined slaves as property that could not be legally taken by the government.

Explanation:

Because slavery was practiced differently throughout the several colonies, there were basic areas of agreement concerning slave laws, regardless of the prevailing form of slavery. Slaves were legally regarded as property, much as animals.

You might be interested in
How did colonists protest the intolerable acts?
Zina [86]
The colonist reacted with the boston tea party 
6 0
4 years ago
5) What event resulted in landowners switching from indentured servants to a slave system of labor?
Helen [10]

Answer:

Many landowners also felt threatened by newly freed servants demand for land. The colonial elite realized the problems of indentured servitude. Landowners turned to African slaves as a more profitable and ever-renewable source of labor and the shift from indentured servants to racial slavery had begun.

6 0
3 years ago
Assalam o aalaikum any Muslim here​
VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:

No.... not me

Explanation:

;p

4 0
3 years ago
Marking people as BRIANLIST <br><br> Why didn’t hitler go for the kill at Dunkirk
Shkiper50 [21]
Rundstedt had ordered the panzer units to halt, concerned about the vulnerability of his flanks and the question of supply to his forward troops. He was also concerned that the marshy ground around Dunkirk would prove unsuitable for tanks and he wished to conserve them for later operations (in some units, tank losses were 30–50 percent). Hitler was also apprehensive, and on a visit to Army Group A headquarters on 24 May, he endorsed the order.
8 0
3 years ago
What was the main goal of the Dawes act
Alexus [3.1K]

The primary goal of the Dawes act of 1887 was to allow the US president to survery Native American lands in order to divide them up into reservations on which the Natives could live if they chose

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Phillis Wheatley and Mercy Otis Warren have in common?
    7·2 answers
  • Which explains how the actions of Bernardo de Gálvez affected British troops in Florida?
    10·2 answers
  • What were the major arguments in the declaration of independence?
    12·1 answer
  • (04.07 LC)Which of the following is true about Europeans and slavery in the Americas?
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone help this is a really hard work sheet
    11·1 answer
  • Which 2 countries started exploring North America soon after Christopher Columbus’s journey to the new world?
    8·2 answers
  • Which town is located on a peninsula between the James and York Rivers? A) Richmond B) Montgomery C) Yorktown D) Pittsburgh
    6·1 answer
  • Natural law was given to humans by<br> God.
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think the framers of the Constitution could have limited or banned slavery? Why or why not?
    13·1 answer
  • What was an argument of the states that wanted to secede? A) president had not campaigned in the Southern states before the elec
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!