Step-by-step explanation:
When the inequality uses < or >, it is a broken line.
For the point (0, 0) it means that x = 0 and y = 0.
Since (0) < (0)² + 4(0) + 5 is true, the point is part of the solution.
If we let x and y represent length and width, respectively, then we can write equations according to the problem statement.
.. x = y +2
.. xy = 3(2(x +y)) -1
This can be solved a variety of ways. I find a graphing calculator provides an easy solution: (x, y) = (13, 11).
The length of the rectangle is 13 inches.
The width of the rectangle is 11 inches.
______
Just so you're aware, the problem statement is nonsensical. You cannot compare perimeter (inches) to area (square inches). You can compare their numerical values, but the units are different, so there is no direct comparison.
Answer:
87.92
Step-by-step explanation:
you have to multiply 3.14 by 2 which will give you 6.28, then you multiply 6.28 by 14 which gives you 87.92. hope this helps
Answer:
X=8
Step-by-step explanation:
Opposite side angles on the transversal are congruent.
SO 6x-2=46
46+2=48
48/6=8
X=8
Angles:
2 acute angles and 2 obtuse angles
Sides:
2 pairs pf parallel sides