1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pickupchik [31]
3 years ago
9

Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned in 1954 when the Supreme Court decided that racial segregation was unconstitutional. segregati

on was necessary for "public peace and good order." the "separate but equal" doctrine applied to education. the government could not legislate equality.
History
2 answers:
frutty [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

racial segregation was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

edge 2020

kogti [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A) racial segregation was unconstitutional.

Explanation:

Edg. test

You might be interested in
Plz answer these 4 question please:
lina2011 [118]
The author shows a how a protective tariff will benefit people in his town by describing the various ways in which the protective tariff could help benefit people, making examples about how different people in town would have some benefits, like the mercantile and its commercial pursuit, or the parents and their earnings that went to the comforts of their aged parents.
<span>---
</span>The author illustrates how the town would be negatively affected if the factory was to close by portraying an imaginary future image where the factory is closed and everyone mentioned before joining in conversations, comparing the past to the present.
<span>---
The proper method for setting questions of economic and national policy is to see for themselves,</span> imagining to themselves the difference between a factory at work and a factory burnt, because when people can see the practical difference between a factory stopped and a factory active, the issue will be easily resolved.<span>
---
</span>A modern autoworker employed by an American manufacturer might favor a protective tariff today because of the aggressive competition from other brands that make life difficult for the American manufacturer, and so the hope is that a protective tariff will help them avoid such impasse.
<span>---
American consumers might oppose a such tariff because of its price, as the price for imported goods will grow, and also because the sociocultural context is different, and globalization should have come to an end to protective tariff mechanism since the manufacturer that works only with American people only on the U.S. soil are very limited.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What is a "war hawk"? A. a person who protests a war B. a person who rallies for going to war C. a person who analyzes the effec
uysha [10]

The correct answer is letter B

A War Hawk is a term generally applied to those members of the House of Representatives who, in the face of a situation of tension or dispute, especially in foreign policy, tend to choose a more aggressive rhetoric or a military solution.

4 0
3 years ago
Henry Clay was known for his skill in
Dominik [7]
A. He was the guy that helped with three major compromises and is known as the great compromiser.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What might convince an investor to buy stock or mutual funds?
svetoff [14.1K]

The correct answer is D) news that a company is about to release a promising product.

<em>The reason that might convince an investor to buy stock or mutual funds is "news that a company is about to release a promising product."</em>

Smart investors are cautious when its time to invest their money but at the same time they are not afraid to invest in a risky scenario when the product seems good and the interest paid is attractive. Smart investors like to diversify its portfolio in order to gain more money from different sources and securing their positions. None of them are going to bet all their money in just one product. So the reason that might convince an investor to buy stock or mutual funds is "news that a company is about to release a promising product."

4 0
3 years ago
In the 17th century, approximately what percentage of English settlers came as indentured servants?
Furkat [3]

Answer:

In the 1600s, nearly two-thirds of English settlers came as indentured servants (that's 2/3 so 66%)

Explanation:

I searched it up

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5) How does Elnora compare in appearance to the city kids who attend her school?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the increased biomass in the sunlit dish arise (i.e., where did the additional mass come from and by what process)?
    9·1 answer
  • What was an important part of the northwest ordinance
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main reason imperial nations built large naval forces?
    15·2 answers
  • Most buildings in the middle ages were made of ______.
    11·1 answer
  • What proved to be the major stumbling block for Germany in Russia?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of Gaugamela an important turning point in Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain Wallace's rationale for keeping races separate in America?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the essential feature of data stored by geographical information systems?
    10·1 answer
  • What form of writing did the ancient Egyptians use?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!