= 100 ( 1 + 3/100 ) ^ 25
= 209.377793
= 209.4
<h3>
Answer: 10</h3>
====================================================
Explanation:
The two smaller triangles are proportional, which lets us set up this equation
5/n = n/15
Cross multiplying leads to
5*15 = n*n
n^2 = 75
----------
Apply the pythagorean theorem on the smaller triangle on top, or on the right.
a^2+b^2 = c^2
5^2+n^2 = m^2
25+75 = m^2
100 = m^2
m^2 = 100
m = sqrt(100)
m = 10
I can't be entirely sure what you want to "do" about the slope,
but here is how to FIND it if you have the line on the graph:
-- You pick two points on the graph line.
-- Find the difference in 'y' between the two points.
-- Find the difference in 'x' between the two points.
-- The slope of the line between the two points is
(the difference in 'y')
divided by
(the difference in 'x') .
-- If the line on the graph is a straight line, then
the slope is the same everywhere on it.
18 6/7<em /> is the awnser
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.