Answer is a because a^-2 will be changed to 1/a^2
Hope that helps
Answer:
The total cost for john's meal would be $66.84
Step-by-step explanation:
6.5% of 52.30 = 3.3995
52.30 plus 3.3995 = 55.6995
20% of 55.6995 = 11.14$
55.6995 + 11.14 = $66.84
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
171 19/32=(171×32+19)/32=(odd number)/32.
But 32=2⁵
Thus, this ratio cannot be simplified, because the numerator is an odd number.
And the denominator is a power of 2.
Here is your answer friend