What we know so far:
Side 1 = 55m
Side 2 = 65m
Angle 1 = 40°
Angle 2 = 30°
What we are looking for:
Toby's Angle = ?
The distance x = ?
We need to look for Toby's angle so that we can solve for the distance x by assuming that the whole figure is a SAS (Side Angle Side) triangle.
Solving for Toby's Angle:
We know for a fact that the sum of all the angles of a triangle is 180°; therefore,
180° - (Side 1 + Side 2) = Toby's Angle
Toby's Angle = 180° - (40° + 30°)
Toby's Angle = 110°
Since we already have Toby's angle, we can now solve for the distance x by using the law of cosines r² = p²+ q²<span>− 2pq cos R where r is x, p is Side1, q is Side2, and R is Toby's Angle.
</span>
x² = Side1² + Side2² - 2[(Side1)(Side2)] cos(Toby's Angle)
x² = 55² + 65² - 2[(55)(65)] cos(110°)
x² = 3025 + 4225 -7150[cos(110°)]
x² = 7250 - 2445.44
x = √4804.56
x = 69.31m
∴The distance, x, between two landmarks is 69.31m
Answer:
no it is not a right angle triangle
Use PEMDAS. Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Addition, Subtraction.
So, you'd distribute 5 into the parenthesis, leaving you with 9+20x+20, then add like terms. 20x+29
✦ᴇᴀᴄʜ ᴘᴇʀsᴏɴ ᴡɪʟʟ ɢᴇᴛ 2 ᴄᴏᴏᴋɪᴇs...
☑ Explanation :
❣❣...ℏ✺℘ḙ !т ℏḙℓ℘ṧ ʏ✺ṳ...❣❣
Answer:
The answer is "Option C".
Step-by-step explanation:
This study looks after results including such illness growth during the trial time, and this includes additional elements such as suspected risk or source of protection (s). The study usually consists of taking and looking at such a cohort of subjects for a long time. The main advantage of these studies is knowledge accumulation and higher efficiency. Systematic reviews may suffer from choice distortion, in addition to the potential indication misinterpretation.
