1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Cloud [144]
2 years ago
8

Debates in the us congress allow members of congress to:

Law
1 answer:
Vlad1618 [11]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

Debates in the US Congress allow certain members of the Congress to state their objections to certain parts of a proposed bill.

You might be interested in
There are many modes of constitutional interpretation. In 500 words discuss two forms (i.e., aspirationalism, strict constructio
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

There are three basic modes of constitutional interpretation: strict construction, aspirationalism, and textualism. The strict construction approach seeks to apply the Constitution according to what it says explicitly rather than based on desirable social consequences; the aspirational approach applies the Constitution based on societal standards regardless of whether it contradicts what it says, and the textualist approach looks only at the text of laws regardless of their effect on society.

The literal interpretation assumes that the US Constitution was set in stone by an all-knowing entity. If this is true, then what use are the amendments if one had already decided the outcome of every single dispute ever framed under them? The idea of being open to interpretation is so that new issues can be solved using old principles. Yes, some people may choose to "go rogue" with these principles come up, but I side with keeping my own freedoms limited for greater freedoms for others. And finally, aspirationalism takes into account that America's founding fathers wanted aspirations, not just laws. They would have understood that sometimes even they couldn't agree on moral solutions, and they knew times change over time.

I prefer strict aspirational because it takes into account social progress. The Constitution is meant to be a living document that isn't static, and the Constitution was written in a time when slavery, women's suffrage and segregation were still acceptable. The Constitution needs to evolve with society and make sense in modern times - interpretations.

The Constitution was written at a time when slavery was legal in America - aspirationalism would have been impossible back then. The Constitution works on interpretation - if it didn't, we wouldn't need it. Over time, we've developed aspirationalism to be able to interpret the Constitution more fairly. It's not what the Constitution says, it's how well society can agree to interpret that.

Explanation:

The modes of constitutional interpretation are two of the most popular ways in which constitutional law is interpreted. An aspirationalist judge would favor arguments that all legislation should follow the “original intent” of the constitution while strict constructionists follows the literal text of the constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dn3rlwdnwqbfy3evfs deubfiwbfweviuebuevyibujbkhvyguhnjkbh
jeka94

Answer:

JFIXJFIDFBDIGJDJJDNICJFKFNCJGJDJJCJJDJCJDF

Explanation:

HDJDJFJDFHIDFHJDJFIXFJDJFJXJJJDIFJF

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Craig Brown owns a home in San Francisco, California. There is a major earthquake and his house is damaged by the earthquake. Wh
brilliants [131]
Specialized coverage!!
3 0
3 years ago
In court, what would a prosecutor need to document for evidence to be admitted?
stepan [7]
The identity of every person who has taken custody of the evidence is the correct answer I think
6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME! I'M STUCK AND SUPER CONFUSED! WILL GIVE BRAINlIEST TO WHOEVER HELPS THE MOST!
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

1.A

2C

3D

4B

5A

6A

7B

8A

9D

10D

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS:)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you’re driving a car and know there’s a motorcyclist are you, you should
    12·1 answer
  • A document called the​ ________ was adopted by several federal agencies in 1978 and provided a single set of principles that wer
    7·1 answer
  • Opinion sobre las relaciones entre etica y politica
    6·1 answer
  • The English Bill of Rights of 1689 states, “That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, withou
    15·2 answers
  • An individual is arrested for stealing mail from a United
    15·2 answers
  • Which early US
    15·1 answer
  • What do you think makes a particular action a crime ?
    15·2 answers
  • Match the following offender complaints to the amendments that protect their rights.
    10·1 answer
  • How to prove provocation in Crimes​
    5·1 answer
  • Television shows like Judge Judy and The People’s Court can offer a distorted view of the judicial process, but they do represen
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!