Having my own house. As a child, it seems fun to have a place to yourself and be able to decorate it however you’d like. As an adult, you realize you have to pay a large amount of money for the house, bills, etc.
Answer:
B) Only adjust the music player when your vehicle is stopped. Do not try to adjust it while driving.
plz mark me brainliest
Explanation:
Answer:
1 way is keep the page up. Don’t take the page down. If new inventory is en route, keep the product page up and alive. A 404 error will be an even worse experience for consumers coming from a search engine or, perhaps, a link on a social media site.
Moreover, a search engine bot might remove your page from the index if it’s down for an extended period. When new inventory is in your warehouse, there might not be many customers left to buy it.
Answer:
it depends on if the juvenile wants to better themselfs
Explanation:
if a person under the age of 18 and has committed a serious crime, it depends if the person wants to change their actions to being a "normal" person after his or her punishment.
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the <em>United States v. Booker</em> (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
