Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
You have to pay back interest, and the later you pay, the more you owe!<span />
Explanation:
I mean, everybody deserves to have an achievement plan. So why not make one from it?
Answer:
260 million. The answer is not in the available options.
Explanation:
Projected benefit obligation as at January 01, 2018 250
Add: Service cost 30
Add: Interest Cost (250*6%) 15
Less: Retiree benefits paid 35
Projected benefit obligation as at December 31, 2018 260
This is an example of Tying rewards and incentives directly to the achievement of strategic and financial targets.
By doing this, general Electric aimed to create an objective measurement for all of its emloyees that motivate them to keep increasing their performance if they hope to stay as an employee in that company. Through this method, Jack Welch managed to increase the company's value for around 4000% during 20 years of his reign.
