Answer:
The battle of who should hold more power, the national government or the states, is perhaps the most seasoned battle in American history. Many believe that the states should hold more control over the national government, yet I differ sometimes. In the present society we have progressing banters about numerous points that worry general society. One of the huge issues that gets talked about frequently is whether maryjane ought to be authorized or not. I am fair with regards to this specific point, yet I do have a solid feeling on who ought to choose. At this moment, there are a few states around the nation that have authorized it, however the National government has not. This makes things incredibly confounding most definitely. The other concern I have is with the detained populace because of cannabis infringement. I think that its unjustifiable that there are individuals getting detainment charges for accomplishing something that another resident in a neighboring state is openly doing. I comprehend that individuals are worried about the possibility that that on the off chance that we permit the national government to settle on choices like this, at that point they will develop to be excessively ground-breaking, however I differ right now. There are measures set up to adjust the forces of the government, and we should confide in what the organizers had as a top priority when they drafted the constitution. At the point when they made the constitution, they gave the central government all the forces they figured they ought to have Article 1 area 8. They did this with the aim that they would shield the central government from getting excessively huge. The originators were clever people however, and they realized that the issues written in 1787 would not be the main ones to cross the ways of the American individuals. Considering this they included the "essential and legitimate statement", which was added to guarantee they could manage issues that emerged later on.
Answer:
Cost of Goods Sold will decrease by $2,679 after proration.
Explanation:
Under-applied or over applied overhead:
= Overhead incurred - Overhead applied
= $76,000 - $79,700
= (-$3,700)
Therefore, the Cost of Goods Sold after the proration:
= (over applied overhead × Overhead applied to COGS) ÷ Total overhead applied to cost of goods sold and finished goods
= ($3,700 × $57,700) ÷ ($57,700 + $22,000)
= $213,490,000 ÷ $79,700
= $2,679
Hence, the Cost of Goods Sold will decrease by $2,679 after proration.
Answer:
Simple rate of return = 17.7%
Explanation:
Simple rate of return = incremental operating income ÷ initial investment
Depreciation = $468,000 ÷ 6years = $78,000
incremental operating income = $161,000-$78,000 =$83,000
Simple rate of return = $83,000÷$468,000=17.7%
Answer:
D): $17,308
Explanation: 300,000/365 = 822. 822 * 21 = 17300
Answer:
a. reaction
Explanation:
<u>Participant reactions</u> are the most basic way to see how they assessed the training and development evaluation made by the HR department. Although the behavioral change would fully reflect how the development and training actually went, it takes time to see when and how employees will implement the learnt skill or knowledge in work.
Therefore, the easiest and least expensive way to measure satisfaction and get timely feedback is to follow the reactions of the participants.
