Answer:
It's mostly likely he would search the internet for information.
Answer:
The Correct option is <u>"B"</u>
Explanation:
Any person who by arguments verbal or written or by behavior characterize himself, or wittingly documents himself to be drawn, to be a companion in a very secure, is responsible as a companion in this organization to any person who has on the religion of one such illustration specified credit to the organization, whether or not the individual signifying himself or drawn to be a companion will or doesn't understand that the illustration has extended the individual therefore providing credit.
Answer:
The journal entry is as follows:
Retained earnings A/c Dr. $18 million
To common stock $0.30 million
To capital paid in excess A/c $17.70 million
(To record the stock dividend issued at 1%)
Working notes:
Shares issued = 1% of 30 million
= 0.30 million
Retained earnings:
= 0.30 million × $60 per share
= $18 million
Common stock:
= 0.30 million × $1 par value
= $0.30 million
Capital paid in excess:
= Retained earnings - Common stock
= $18 million - $0.30 million
= $17.7 million
Answer:
- Yes it is.
- Ethical issue ⇒ Insider Trading.
Explanation:
Trading on the stock exchange is supposed to be as fair as possible so that every investor has a fair chance of making returns. If a person - like this supervisor - is using information that is material but not publicly disclosed yet to trade on markets, the fairness of the market is compromised because the person will have an edge over other investors which will enable them make unfair profits.
Information on quarterly returns is usually material so we can expect it to be material here as well which means that the supervisor is engaged in insider trading.
Insider trading is not only unethical but also highly illegal. Reporting your supervisor can get them sent to jail.
Answer:
Import substitution industrialization (ISI) is a trade and economic policy which advocates replacing foreign imports with domestic production. Domestic consumers benefit from import substitution as they do not have to face strong competition from foreign competitors and can sell their goods at a higher price. So for example manufacturers in USA sell a battery from $10 but consumers from USA have the option to import that battery at $7 from China the US manufacturers wont be able to compete as Chinese companies have lower cost of production therefore they can sell cheaper and in order to protect the local manufacturers the government may use an ISI strategy to help the local manufacturers. On the other hand consumers are harmed from this strategy as they cannot buy the cheaper product because of change in government strategy. So consumers who were buying the battery at $7 not have to buy it at $10.
Explanation:
