I was the British army better train and equip than the continental army?

History

1 answer:

aev [14]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Yes. The British army had years of experience and had adequate uniforms, weapons, etc. The Continental Army were, as a whole, ill-trained and ill-equipped. Many didn't know how to properly serve in the military.

You might be interested in

What was the PRIMARY reason the United States was interested in acquiring Hawaii in the 1800s?

skad [1K]

Answer:

C) Business Interests

Explanation:

Specifically, U.S business were developing pineapple and sugarcane farms which positively impacted the nation’s economy.

5 0

3 years ago

How did India emerge as a independent country

Kobotan [32]

Due to non-violent methods of the Father of Our Nation Mahatma Ghnadi which led to the British withdrawing from India in August 15 1947

6 0

3 years ago

Need help with this ASAP. Which regions were affected by the Cold War?

tigry1 [53]

Answer:

Central Asia and Europe

Explanation:

Those regions are when the USSR collapsed in 1991, 15 new countries were formed from within its former borders, and the balance of power in Eastern Europe had been destroyed

8 0

3 years ago

Which agreement was labeled by the Nazis as

horsena [70]

It was the "Treaty of Versailles" that was labeled by the Nazis as <span>unfair to Germany, since this treaty demanded harsh reparations from Germany that were almost impossible to pay. It also forbid Germany from developing a strong military. </span>

7 0

3 years ago

People in the 1700's and 1800's wrote journals and letters Why do you think this is true?

Marat540 [252]

Because they didn't have phones or computers back then to type on or call people so they had to write everything down

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I was the British army better train and equip than the continental army￼?

I was the British army better train and equip than the continental army?