1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
2 years ago
13

Explain the meaning of plaintiff and defendant by describing their roles in a lawsuit.

Law
2 answers:
mamaluj [8]2 years ago
5 0
The individual who files a lawsuit against another party is the plaintiff, while the party the lawsuit is brought against is considered the defendant.
Lostsunrise [7]2 years ago
4 0
The plaintiff is the one who is suing. They provide evidence and reasoning to why the defendant should be sued. The defendant is the person who is defending themselves for why they should not be sued. They also provide evidence and reasoning. Plaintiff and defendant parties are only in civil cases. Also plaintiffs are always on the left side and defendants are on the right when looking at them in the judges view. (This is irrelevant but I thought I’d tell you, since it helps to determine who is who)
You might be interested in
What is an international agreement that requires senate approval
poizon [28]
An international agreement that requires senate approval is a treaty.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements comes closest to your
Travka [436]
B

I am studying law right now and I know this is B
5 0
2 years ago
Tatiana is looking to purchase a BMW that costs $30,000. She will make a $6,000  down payment and borrow the remaining with a 60
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

$30,000 - $6,000 = $24,000

$24,000 to finance at 4.71% for 60 months

24,000 divided by 60 = $400/month + 4.71% ( $18.84) = $418.84/month.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
SIZIF [17.4K]
The answer is choice d
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suzy loaded her .38 caliber pistol, snuck out the back door, and, unknown to Bob, with finger on the trigger aimed directly at h
Rudik [331]

Answer:

Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.

Explanation:

Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.

This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How old was president G.H.W. Bush when he was first inaugurated
    13·2 answers
  • What characteristics has to be present for government to be an oligarchy
    9·2 answers
  • Defined Snell's law ​
    7·2 answers
  • The work of private security personnel is analogous to law enforcement officers, which means: the work of both is exactly the sa
    14·1 answer
  • How does international law impact on Australian law and how is international incorporated in Australian law?
    8·1 answer
  • How does Medicare for All promote equality in our health care system? Please provide evidence to support how it does.
    11·1 answer
  • What are the three levels of court in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement is true about oral contracts?
    15·1 answer
  • This has nothing to do with school but I want to go to the boywithuke concert on may 12 and it says 16+ can I (13) go with a leg
    10·1 answer
  • The current copyright law allows an author to put their work into the public domain if they so choose and not profit from it
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!