Answer:
False
Explanation:
The given statement is false.
The reason for the the statement to be false is that the 22nd amendment states that no Person can be elected as the president of the country more than once also the person cannot contest as a President even if the person holds or acted as the president for more than two years in his entire lifetime.
Answer:
“Standard” California misdemeanors, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000; 1and. “Gross” or “aggravated” misdemeanors,” punishable by up to 364 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000 or more.
In mathematical modeling, statistical modeling, and experimental sciences, there are independent and dependent variables.
- Dependent variables get their name because, during an experiment, their values are examined under the assumption or requirement that they are dependent on the values of other variables due to some law or rule (for example, a mathematical function).
- In the context of the experiment in question, independent variables are those that are not perceived as dependent on any other factors.
A body camera or wearable camera is a wearable audio, video, or photographic recording system used to capture events that law enforcement officers are involved in. On an officer's uniform, they are normally worn on the torso.
- The deployment of police body cameras has drawn a lot of media attention in recent years. These tools are widely thought to accomplish a number of goals, including lowering police use-of-force and complaints against officers, improving police legitimacy and transparency, raising prosecution rates, and enhancing police evidence collection.
- Because of all the exposure, many people now believe that cameras can fundamentally alter "flawed" police procedures.
Thus this is the answer of dependent and independent variable and police worn cameras.
To learn more about dependent and independent variable, refer:brainly.com/question/3764906
To learn more about police worn cameras, refer: brainly.com/question/21576230
#SPJ10
Answer:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Explanation: