Answer:
Acton, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 1995, ruled (6–3) that an Oregon school board's random drug-testing policy for student athletes was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
Answer:
hi there!
i believe it is different for each states. the baker act provided emergency mental health services and temporary detention to people who are unsafe because of their mental illness. your sister can be held in there involuntarily for only up to 72 hours.. that is if she wasnt a minor, now for her it is only 12 hours before examination is initiated. you said that you and your family have not been able to see her? as im researching more about this law, it found out that "unless having visitors will be harmful to the person being treated. If a facility wants to restrict visitors from a patient, they must file a written notice documenting the refusal of visitation." which means you guys must have gotten a written notice telling you that seeing her isnt the safest option right now. since your sister is a minor someone must have had to contacted the police/ law enforcement about her..
mental heath facilities have to provide notice to minor patient guardians, no later than 24 hours after admission, they must also document all contact attempts. that notification must be give as soon as your sister entered at that facility.. it can take just about a full 24 hours if the facility have evidence to believe that the patient has been abused.
i have yet to have any evidence that states that they can hold minors without consent of the legal parent guardian, i doubt that your sister was able to even go into that mental heath facility without your parents or someone with the law knowing.
i really hope this help you and i hope the best for your family and your sister!
( here is a photo that might explain the process a little better then i can at this moment )
Answer:──▄▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▄───
───█▒▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒█───
────█░░█░░░░░█░░█────
─▄▄──█░░░▀█▀░░░█──▄▄─
█░░█─▀▄░░░░░░░▄▀─█░░█
█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█
█░░╦─╦╔╗╦─╔╗╔╗╔╦╗╔╗░░█
█░░║║║╠─║─║─║║║║║╠─░░█
█░░╚╩╝╚╝╚╝╚╝╚╝╩─╩╚╝░░█
█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█
Explanation:
I'm hoping that this is an open-ended or critical thinking question. If not, do not take this answer as critical thinking is what I'm getting at.
If I were to be held at gunpoint by someone I don't know after leaving an apartment, this is how I would react. First of all, I would remain calm and follow the instructions of whomever is harboring the gun. Then, I would survey my surroundings before anything proceeds; for example, if I am at an apartment, I would see if there were any people or cars nearby that I could signal to if I had a chance to catch this stranger off guard. Assuming I am alone, I would continue to follow all instructions and give the impression I will conform early on to increase my chances of getting away later on. I would try to get somewhere public if I could or use my cell or a nearby phone to call 911 if this person were to say, go to the restroom for 2 minutes, or something similar. If all else fails and I believe I am doomed to escape, I would make sure to do what I could that would end up prosecuting this person in the future. For example, I would try to hide my ID in the place so the police would know this is where I was killed or leave some trace of my DNA on the stranger or their belongings.