1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Solnce55 [7]
3 years ago
9

Char and Russ Dasrup have one daughter, Siera, who is 16 years old. In November of last year, the Dasrup’s took in Siera’s 16 ye

ar old friend, Angela, who has lived with them ever since. The Dasrup’s have not legally adopted Angela but Siera often refers to Angela as "her sister." The Dasrup’s provide all of the support for both girls, neither girl receives any income during the year, and both girls live at the Dasrup’s residence. Which of the following statements is true regarding who Char and Russ may claim as dependents for the current year?
A. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child and they may claim Angela as a dependent qualifying child.
B. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child they are not allowed to claim Angela as a dependent.
C. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child and they may claim Angela as a dependent qualifying relative.
D. None of these statements is true.
Law
1 answer:
Stella [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child they are not allowed to claim Angela as a dependent.

Explanation:

Dasprop does not legally adopt Angela, but Sierra often refers to Angela as "her sister." Dasarupa is supportive of both the girls, no income is earned by the girl during the year, and both the girls remain in the Dasarupa residence.

There is no adoption process with four more ropes here because Angela, who lives with them, is not a legal guardian

so correct option is B. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child they are not allowed to claim Angela as a dependent.

You might be interested in
What typically occurs during arraignment
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

An arraignment is a criminal proceeding where the defendant is called before a judge in a court, informed of the charges (either in writing or orally, but usually just in writing) and asked to enter a plea of not guilty, guilty or no contest.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
George is riding his skateboard down the street while listening to music with earbuds in. George does not see Martha, a store ow
erastova [34]

Answer:

Yes, Martha suffered a compensable loss.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Over 132,000 executions have been carried out in the United States, with the first in the early 1700s for treason.
swat32
This is true but don’t quote me on that
3 0
3 years ago
Who was the principle author of the law that was intended to amend the national labor relations act?
WITCHER [35]

Answer: J. Mack Swigert of the Cincinnati law firm Taft, Stettinius & Hollister.

5 0
4 years ago
Which is not a federal cabinet department?
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happens to any criminal evidence that is<br> obtained before Miranda rights are read?
    5·1 answer
  • 5. Political economy involves the study of the relationship between states and markets. a. Define globalization. b. Define econo
    15·1 answer
  • In trial for homicide, a conviction cannot be had the body of the victim has been found.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a benefit of restoration justice, which the judge might have felt was valuable in Justin case?
    6·1 answer
  • Blake worked for West Oregon Lumber Company
    9·1 answer
  • The Twenty-Seventh Amendment is the most recent amendment to the Constitution. Its
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the advaantage of public participation in terms of an individual and of a community​
    12·1 answer
  • Mea 9884 gpiusysvme its a word scramble
    8·1 answer
  • Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
    12·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution establishes that an accused person is presumed to be innocent, until he or she is proven guilty. This part
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!