Answer:
the secont side they have better reasoning
Explanation:
<span>There are many valid reasons for this, but a need for and preventing corruption/dictatorship seem the best reason for me. </span><span>It's a lot of power for one person, and in 8 years, a lot of good (but also a lot of damage) can be done. 8 years is enough for a good president to leave his mark on our country. Going beyond that point, especially with lifetime appointments like Article III judges, potentially lets a president perpetuate his power for a generation</span>
The U.S was never prepared for the Pearl Harbor attack, the Japanese has everything planned out.
The incorporation of the bill of rights is a doctrine that defends that The Bill of Rights should be applicable and respected by the states of the US.
Initially, the Supreme Court was strict on this matter and the common understanding was that the Bill of Rights should only be respected and followed by the Federal Government - you can see it on Barron vs Baltimore case. After the abolition of slavery and the post-civil war era many rights were granted to people and over time the incorporation doctrine gained strength.
