Answer and explanation:
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.
- <em>"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)</em>
In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.
- <em>"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/) </em>
<em />
The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.
Answer:
special power of attorney, Attorney in fact
Explanation:
Ruth had a contract to sell a vacation home she owned in North Carolina. Rather than make the trip from Oregon for the closing, she gave her brother Ian, who lived in North Carolina, the authority to represent her at the closing and to sign all the necessary papers. The notarized document that confers this authority on Ian is a <u>special power of an attorney</u>, and Ian is an <u>attorney in fact</u>. Special power of attorney involves legally authorizing an agent or attorney to represent an you, act on your behalf or decide on your behalf regarding the state of a property under specific and clear terms and circumstances. The individual on whose this special power is transferred is known as an attorney. Hence, Ian is an attorney in this scenario and the special power of an attorney was transferred to him by Ruth.
The items that are considered low risk investments are bonds. Bonds are debt investments where an investor can loan to either the government or big corporations where they can borrow the funds for a specific time frame at a variable fix interest rate.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: " deltaG KNOT=0." the condition that is always true at equilibrium is that of <span> deltaG KNOT=0. This is always at the state of equilibrium.
</span>
