Answer:
2. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
Explanation:
As humans are humans, they get rights just for being human, in which no one can take away or infringe.
Answer:
well in California and made of gold... the lowest around 4k possibly maybe 3k if you lucky
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
1. Roman women could hold office- False
2. Roman women could own property- True
3. Roman women could divorce their husbands- True
Explanation:
Roman women has less political and social status than their men. Roman women can not hold office. They can not occupy a higher position in office. Though who belong to elite society they some time hold a position in social hierarchy.
Roman women can bought property and could be its owner also. Roman women have the power to authorize her property in single handle. Roman women have the right to divorce her husband. If a couple is not happy in their marriage then the female partner can take the decision to be separated from her husband.
