Answer:
A. Market Timing
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the term being described within the question is called Market Timing. Like mentioned in the question this term refers to a strategy of buying and selling different financial assets, usually by trying to take advantage of price discrepancies in the short term.
Answer:
units of output = 2 units
fixed cost = 8
Explanation:
given data
SMC = 2 + 4Q
AVC = 2 + 2Q
to find out
how many units of output will it produce at a market price and what level of fixed cost will this firm earn zero economic profit
solution
we know here that under perfect competition
so at the equilibrium here Price (P) will be = MC
P = MC = 10
and
SMC = 2 + 4Q ,
P = 2 + 4Q
10 = 2 + 4Q
Q = 2 units
and
at zero economic profit we get
TR = TC
TR = P × Q
TR = 10 × 2
TR = 20
so
TC = TFC + TVC
20 = TFC + 12
TFC = 8
because here [ TVC = AVC × Q ]
[ TVC = (2 + 2 × 2) × 2 ]
[ TVC = 12 ]
Answer:
- Lena has a ORDINARY GAIN of $1,500 from the sale of the first equipment.
- Lena has a ORDINARY LOSS of $2,700 from the sale of the second equipment.
Explanation:
Lena sold the first equipment for $17,000, and that resulted in an ordinary gain = $17,000 - $15,500 = $1,500. This gain was due to a §1245 depreciation recapture.
Lena sold the second equipment for $5,500, and that resulted in an ordinary loss (§1231 loss) = $5,500 - $8,200 = $2,700.
Answer: No, because Mallory and Raghav are not bound by the contract.
Explanation: Being bound by a contract entails being linked to a written agreement, the breaching of which could result in consequences lying with the person who breached the contract. However when this contract was entered into, there was a clause that allowed the parties to cancel the contract at any time. When Mallory fired Raghav the contract was subsequently cancelled, making the contract null and void (non - existent). This means that Raghav is not entitled to the outstanding 10 months' salaries.
The case was appealed to the superior court which is the highest court in jurisdiction.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In common law system, a superior court is a court of general capability which commonly has boundless ward as to deal with the common and criminal legitimate cases.
The superior court can deal with the criminal and the common civil cases in which they have no boundations since they have the highest jurisdiction in the order so there is no limitation.
