Answer:
Explanation:
China was a world-dominating country in the Old and in the New World. Many countries nearby were mesmerized by the thousands of spices, which as a result made countries like Spain go find for the treacherous Spice Islands. China influenced countries nearby including Korea, Japan and Vietnam there was syncretism not only in food and culture but in state building this includes how and what are houses being built and how a city is designed. Medieval China cities are similar to cities now-a-days because usually in Medieval China there was a now what is known as downtown which is where all the fast moving jobs and lives take place. Well in China it was the same all of the local supermarkets and shops where located there and it was consistently busy and on going traffic. Also when first entering a city there is a welcome sign which is a great big greeting in Medieval China this is important as it attract newcomers for a greater economy. With syncretism taking place there is also differences which include a larger city with roads in older times the city was set up like a rectangle and there were tenants for multiple families to live each building had a purpose. Now there are multiple buildings spread out to do the same thing.
Answer: The pilgrims came looking for religious freedom while the puritans came for religious freedom and many puritans came for economic opportunity too. The puritans came much more prepared with food than the Pilgrims. The Pilgrims came wanting to leave the Church of England while the Puritans wanted to purify it.
Explanation:
Based on this scenario, it is likely that they weren’t able
to see each other a lot of each other outside of the school as it could be seen
in the scenario above where they likely to engage many conversations, showing a
fact that they weren’t able to see each other having them to have more things
to talk to.
Answer:
Conquistadors or conquistadores were the invaders, knights, soldiers, and explorers of the Spanish and the Portuguese Empires.
Some reasons for abolishing the Electoral College and introducing direct vote for the candidate are the following
1) voting would be more transparent and understandable to voters
2) voters might be more motivated to vote because their vote would have more direct influence
3) a sitation when a president did not get a majority of votes would not be possible (as it is now).
