This is a Test provided by Brainly, If you are seeing this, Simply ignore it.

What is it known as when both the federal government and state government share a particular power?

sdas [7]

Answer:

concurrent powers

Explanation:

Concurrent powers are powers that are shared by both the State and the federal government. These powers may be exercised simultaneously within the same territory and in relation to the same body of citizens. These concurrent powers including regulating elections, taxing, borrowing money and establishing courts.

3 0

3 years ago

I Need help ASAP!!!

Svetllana [295]

I believe you can just click the three dots that appear to the top right on their response and report , I don’t know any other way unfortunately.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is the most important idea that should be embraced?

worty [1.4K]

A copy of Trotha's Extermination Order survives in the Botswana National Archives. The order states "every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women or children, I will drive them back to their people [to die in the desert] or let them be shot at."

8 0

3 years ago

Why would it be ethical for a police officer to give someone medical information about a person that needs medical care but it c

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

Providers should notify the police that, due to patient care and HIPAA concerns, police (like other members of the public) are generally not given unrestricted access to patient care areas. Patient Consent. If the police request access to a patient, the provider should seek the patient’s consent unless the police prohibit it due. First, the organization must ascribe to a mission statement and a clear set of operating values that represent more than hollow promises, but, rather, establish standards for employees’ behavior at all levels and illustrate that ethics play a crucial role in an officer’s success in the agency. A police officer must use judgment and exercise care in using a weapon or other piece of equipment. A police officer must not: 1) show, handle or point a weapon without justification.” (2). There are two of the most ignored areas of police work are: 1 code of ethics. 2 oath of office.

<u>Does this help, if so, give me brainliest when possible (pls)</u>

5 0

3 years ago

Please provide an example of a scenario where a police officer would, or would not, be legally entitled to stop and potentially

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

When Can the Police Stop and Frisk You on the Street?

A look at the history of "stop and frisk," and the circumstances required to make its use legal.

by Marcia Layton Turner

updated September 04, 2020 · 3 min read

Man standing by crosswalk

The United States' “stop and frisk" rule originated from the Fourth Amendment's language regarding unreasonable searches and seizures.

The policy actually allows police to stop and “pat down" anyone they suspect may be committing, have committed, or are about to commit a crime. Their suspicion alone is what permits them to stop you and search you.

The current stop and frisk policy has been legal since 1968, when the Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. Ohio to allow police officers the flexibility to temporarily detain and search someone they suspect has done or is in the process of doing something illegal.

Since then, all 50 states have adopted this ruling in some form.

Unfortunately, rather than rooting out crime, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New York reports that 9 out of 10 New Yorkers who have been stopped and frisked were innocent. Some people see stop and frisk as a form of harassment.

Explanation:

If a police officer suspects you are in some way involved in illegal activity, they have the authority to stop you, whether you're walking, driving, biking, boating, or engaged in some other activity.

“During a stop, you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave," explains Tod Spodek, managing partner of the Spodek Law Group.

“When an officer stops your car, the officer must have a reasonable suspicion that someone in the car committed a crime, or probable cause to believe the driver committed a traffic violation."

7 0

3 years ago