Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
The twenty second amendment
Supreme Court: Traditional religious belief not necessary for conscientious objector status. ... The Court ruled 6-3 that his beliefs were sufficiently religious such that he was entitled to CO status. Justice Hugo L. Black authored an opinion for four justices interpreting the Selective Service Act.
Answer:
yes and no
Explanation:
might aswell mark brainliest as well ;)
