When the aps is 0.20, then this means select one:

In cities where people typically go to retire, there tends to be larger markets for Viagra. Nancy, a Viagra saleswoman, recently

katrin2010 [14]

Nancy, who was a Viagra saleswoman in Utah before moving to Florida, would be considered frictionally unemployed.

<h3>What is frictional unemployment?</h3>

Frictional unemployment exists in a situation when a person could be gainfully employed but decides to seek employment elsewhere.

The movement from employed status to seeking employment creates frictional unemployment.

Thus, Nancy, who was a Viagra saleswoman in Utah before moving to Florida, would be considered frictionally unemployed.

Learn more about frictional unemployment at brainly.com/question/11481076

#SPJ12

8 0

2 years ago

We are evaluating a project that costs $786,000, has an eight-year life, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is s

Nimfa-mama [501]

Answer:

base scenario:

initial outlay = $786,000

depreciation expense per year = $786,000 / 8 = $98,250

contribution margin per unit = $48 - $25 = $23

total units sold per year = 65,000

fixed costs per year = $725,000

tax rate = 22%

NCF year 0 = -$786,000

NCF year 1-8 = {[($23 x 65,000) - $98,250 - $725,000] x 0.78} + $98,250 = $622,215

NPV = $2,533,471.10

IRR = 78%

best case scenario:

initial outlay = $786,000

depreciation expense per year = $786,000 / 8 = $98,250

contribution margin per unit = ($48 x 110%) - ($25 x 90%) = $30.30

total units sold per year = 65,000 x 110% = 71,500

fixed costs per year = $725,000 x 90% = $625,500

tax rate = 22%

NCF year 0 = -$786,000

NCF year 1-8 = {[($30.30 x 71,500) - $98,250 - $625,500] x 0.78} + $98,250 = $1,223,556

NPV = $5,741,580.96

IRR = 156%

worst case scenario:

initial outlay = $786,000

depreciation expense per year = $786,000 / 8 = $98,250

contribution margin per unit = ($48 x 90%) - ($25 x 110%) = $15.70

total units sold per year = 65,000 x 90% = 58,500

fixed costs per year = $725,000 x 110% = $797,500

tax rate = 22%

NCF year 0 = -$786,000

NCF year 1-8 = {[($15.70 x 58,500) - $98,250 - $797,500] x 0.78} + $98,250 = $172,116

NPV = $132,226.16

IRR = 14%

7 0

3 years ago

if interest rates are positive, the future value of a given sum will always be less than the present value

Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

False. If interest rates are positive, the future value will always be more than the present value.

Explanation:

Future value is given by:

FV = PV $(1 + i)^{n}$

wherein, FV= Future Value

PV= Present Value

i = rate of interest per period

n = number of periods

So, if interest rates are positive, the current investment shall be compounded to arrive at Future value which would turn out to be more than the present value.

For example, $ 100 invested today at 10% per annum, after an year would yield $110. This represents future value.

In case future value is provided as 110$ and rate of interest is given as 10% per annum, such future value discounted at 10% would give $100 today which represents the present value.

Thus, Future value will always be more than the present value if interest rates are positive.

5 0

3 years ago

Clay offers to pay Diane $50 for a golf lesson for Ewan. They agree to meet on Friday to exchange the cash for the lesson. These

Lelechka [254]

Answer:

Bilateral contract.

Explanation:

Bilateral contract: It is a legally binding contract between two or more parties, wherein each party agree to fullfil the promise made to each other.

There are four elements necessary for the existence of a bilateral contract:

Agreement.
Consideration.
Intention to create legal relations.
Certainty.

In the given case, Clay offers to pay Diane $50 for a golf lesson for Ewan, which they are fulfilling by agreeing to meet on Friday to exchange the cash for the lesson. Therefore, these parties have made a bilateral contract.

4 0

4 years ago

2. If the public expects a corporation to lose $5 a share this quarter and it actually loses $4, which is still the largest loss

inn [45]

Answer:

Price of the stock will rise or increase

Explanation:

Efficient market hypothesis states that price of stock factors in all information related to the stock. As such, nobody can take advantage of higher returns offered by a particular stock for a long time.

In line with efficient market efficiency, if public expected a bigger loss of $5 but loss was only for $4, the price of stock will increase. Though the company still suffers a loss, it is less than what was expected by the market, resulting in increase in stock price.

5 0

4 years ago