Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the table attached,
x-intercept of the linear function is, the value of 'x' when f(x) = 0
x = 3 [x-intercept]
Function 'g' is the sum of 2 and the cube root of the sum of three time x and 1.
g(x) = ![2+\sqrt[3]{3x+1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%2B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%2B1%7D)
For x-intercept,
g(x) = 0
![2+\sqrt[3]{3x+1}=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%2B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B3x%2B1%7D%3D0)
3x + 1 = (-2)³
3x + 1 = -8
3x = -8 - 1
3x = -9
x = -3
Therefore, the x-intercept of function 'f' is different or greater than the x-intercept of function g.
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
11/4 plus 11/4 is 22/4
to make this a whole number and a fraction we subtract 4 from the 22 as many times as we can. we can do this 5 times, with 2 left over.
the answer is 5 2/4, which you can simplify to 5 and a half
Answer:
73.6
61.824
.2776
2.3
1.342
.4129
*note* I had trouble reading the standard deviation of the second part, so if it's not 3 then leave a comment and i will fix it*
Step-by-step explanation:
1.)
the mean would be something like 460*.16= 73.6
The variance should be 460*.16(1-.16)= 61.824 which means the standard deviation is √61.824= 7.863
for p to be less than .15 it would have to be less than .15*460= 69
(69-73.6)/7.863= -.59 which has a probability of .2776
2.)
the mean is 2.3
I am not sure if the standard deviation is 3 or .3 (picture is kind of blurry)
I am thinking that it's three which would mean that the standard deviation would be √(3²*(1/5))= 1.342
(2-2.3)/1.342= -.22 = .4129
