Answer: They help a customer solve a problem without promoting a particular company's products
Explanation:
White paper is simply refered to as an authoritative report that is used in order to addresses certain issues that are deemed to be vital and also provide solution to such issues.
White papers gives awareness regarding particular products and it helps customer solve a problem without promoting a particular company's products.
Answer:
And he has reasons to be angry. The hotels usually are part of a large chain that can provide service for costumers to be happy in the given case that something like what you described happens. The hotel is not taking into account the interest and concerns of it's costumer and that will greatly affect the reputation the have.
Explanation:
When a company "Guarantee" a service or product is under the moral obligation to satisfy the costumer on the terms previously agreed on. Managers should be aware that failing to fix the problem will no doubt affect the perception of possible clients in the future.
Answer:
B. what businesses believe will generate the most profits.
Explanation:
A market economy is one where the factors of production are owned by the private sector. Production and distribution of products and services are in the hands of private individuals and firms. The government's role is mostly regulation and the provision of public goods.
In the market economy, the private sector engages in business to make profits. They risk their resources in producing goods and services that can increase their wealth. Only the products that are likely to generate profits are produced.
Answer:
$315,198
Explanation:
WACC = [ Equity / Total value ] * cost of equity + [ Debt / Total value ] * Cost of debt.
WACC = 11.5%
Exit multiple = Total cash outflow / Total cash inflow
Exit multiple = $120,000 / 36,000 = 3.3x
EBITDA of the company is $178,412.
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
