Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
If the Federal Reserve decreased the money supply, the effects would be:
- Increased interest rates
- Decreased borrowing
- Decreased investing
<h3>What is money supply?</h3>
This refers to the total number of money in an economy at a point in time. The federal reserve uses various tools to control the supply of money in circulation.
A reduced money supply increases interest rates, which makes borrowing more expensive and slows corporate investing
Learn more about money supply here: brainly.com/question/3625390
#SPJ1
Answer:
equivalence principle. Particles follow geodesics that are extremal paths in spacetime. These paths are the same for any mass m so long as this test mass is small m << M for M the mass of a central mass that defines a gravity field. If the spacetime curvature is due to a gravity wave or some other physics, the curvature of this field R is such that R >> 8πGm^2. If this test mass is sufficiently large it has its own appreciable curvature and this results in a highly complex problem similar to the 3-body problem in Newtonian mechanics.
I have though been thinking about this a bit differently. The equivalence principle states that the freely falling frame is equivalent to a frame in flat spacetime far removed from any gravity field. I have been thinking of this according to quantum field theory. A freely falling frame is one which has a vacuum equivalent to a quantum vacuum in flat spacetime. The geodesic the frame falls under is one which preserves this vacuum.
This may be extended to massive particles and massless particles. A massless particle is on a null geodesic and is then on a “null frame.” These frames are then projective varieties over massless quantum fields in that vacuum. These massless fields all have transverse modes, but no longitudinal modes. A massive particle has a longitudinal mode, and the vacuum modes have dispersion as a result. This is due to the presence of the Higgs field.
An accelerated frame is one which has a vacuum equivalent to a particular vacuum near a black hole. Depending on the acceleration parameter this can be a different vacuum. In this way aspects of spacetime physics can be thought according to quantum mechanical or quantum field properties. Spacetime is probably an emergent phenomenon of quantum physics.
Explanation:
The camel helped transport export materials over long distances. So camels expanded the distances that people could travel. Hope this helps.
