Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Current ratio shows the liquidity of of a company. This ratio tells us how a company or business is able to meet its short obligation.
This ration is very important to lenders because they use it to know of you will be able to meet the interest payment and principal
The formula for current ratio is:
Current assets/current liabilities
Total current assets is $493,000, Total current liabilities is $357,000
= $493,000/$357,000
=1.38
Answer:
benefit those in the worst position.
Explanation:
Rawls theory is based on the concept that no inequalities shall prevail in the country. Although some inequalities are unavoidable.
In those circumstances, when Rawls shall agree to such inequalities, and in-fact, further states that it shall benefit all the people. But for this he states that those in the worst position shall be benefited first and with maximum.
This shall create an equality as these people facing inequality will not be criticised further for any purpose, if they are paid off well in the first instance only.
Answer:
Beta distribution
Explanation:
Beta distribution In probability theory
is regarded as a part of continuous probability distributions with a defined interval which could be 0 and 1, and it is characterized with two positive parameters (α and β) which is seen as
as exponents of the random variable .
It should be noted that Beta distribution probability is commonly used to model the inherent variability of activity time estimates in project management
Answer:
1. False
2. False
3. False
4. True
5. True
Explanation:
1.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a federal law that was established by congress to sweep auditing and financial statements for public companies. The main aim for this was to improve the investor confidence by improving reliability in accounting statements. Errors in the financial statements for the public companies were to be minimized following this law especially in the wake of numerous cases of corporate crime. This law was never passed to ensure that investors only invest in companies that will be profitable, since the choice of which company to invest in is exclusively left to the investor. So the above statement is false.
2.
Ethics can be defined as a set of rules and regulation that govern the moral behavior of someone. Ethical standards vary from one region to another since they are majorly cultural, for example; a behavior in the United States can be considered as appropriate while the same behavior in a different place can be inappropriate. Ethical standards are either right or wrong, and the actions are judged on these terms. Ethics don't measure whether a actions are loyal or disloyal, thus the statement is false.
3.
The primary accounting standard setting body in the United States is Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). This body is charged with regulating and setting the best standard of accounting practice. The FASB usually constitutes a board whose officials are rigorously assessed. The board members have to be professionals in the field of accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission on the other hand is an independent federal agency with the authority to enforce federal security laws. Thus the statement above is false.
4.
The historical cost principle suggests that the companies record assets cost at their original cost and continue to report them at their original cost over the time the asset is held. The historical cost principle is a generally accepted accounting principle that has been in use for a long time. The definition about the historical cost principle in the question above is therefor true.
5.
The monetary unit assumption dictates that business related activities be converted to monetary units. There are some business transactions that are however quite difficult to convert into monetary units, therefor the accountant in using this principle is only obliged to record only the transactions that can be measured in money terms. The statement about monetary units in the question above is thus true.
Answer:
Wages in US would decrease
Wages in Mexico would increase
Explanation:
The increase in the supply of labour in the US while demand remains unchanged would lead to an excess of supply over demand. This would cause equilibrium wage to fall and quantity to rise.
While in the US, the supply of labour would fall. This would increase wage.
I hope my answer helps you
