Answer:
d. Product financing arrangement.
Explanation:
A business transaction in which an organization sells and agrees to repurchase inventory with the repurchase price equal to the initial or original sales price plus the carrying and financing costs is known as the Product financing arrangement.
A product financing arrangement is more likely to exist when the seller commits to having a third party client purchase the item and then agrees to repurchase the item from the third party client.
It's noteworthy to know, that the seller controls how the item sold under either of the above mentioned situations is analysed and disposed of.
Answer:
Unitary cost= $62.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Predetermined overhead rate based on direct labor-hours to apply manufacturing overhead to jobs. At the beginning of the year, manufacturing overhead and direct labor-hours for the year were estimated at $50,000 and 20,000 hours.
Materials costs on the job totaled $4,000 and labor costs totaled $1,500 at $5 per hour.
First, we need to determine the allocated MOH:
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 50000/20000= $2.5 per direct labor hour
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base= 2.5* (1500/5)= $750
Total cost= 4000 + 1500 + 750= $6,250
Unitary cost= 6250/100= $62.5
Mike brought 100 shares costing $53 each.
Total costs of shares= 100*53
=$5300
He got dividends of $1.45 per share. A dividend is money that is earnt back from a share.
Total dividend amount = 1.45*100
=$145
I'm assuming that Mike sold his shares at the end of the year. He sells for $60 each.
Total sales amount=60*100
=$6000
The rate of return in this instance can be defined as the amount of money made back from a share.
Rate of return= total earnings/ costs
Total costs= $5300
Total earnings=$6145
6145/5300=1.1594
=15.9%
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
b. They are treated differently because the loss in value of Carol's stock is the result of a sale, while the loss in value of Dave's stock is simply a decline in value.
Explanation:
Although the stock owned by Carol and by Dave declines in value by $2,000, however Carol only has a realized and recognized loss of $2,000. The main factor in determining whether a disposition has taken place often whether an identifiable event has occurred. In the current scenario, Carol’s stock sale qualifies as a disposition and the Dave’s stock value decline does not qualify as a disposition and is simply a decline in value.
Companies felt that unions were conspiracies which interfere with property right because, unions usually challenge the employers about the working conditions of their workers and the manner the employers treat their workers; they fight for the rights of the worker. Because of this, employers usually do all they can to stop unions from forming.
