Answer:
Explanation:
Although it has been attempted to overturn the ruling in the Helling case, I would suppose that these attempts have been unsuccessful because the ruling was in favor of a higher standard of care than what was deemed appropriate by for the ophthalmologists. One might argue that the ruling has remained in place because holding the defendants liable was, in a way, a step towards checking the medical profession’s privilege to set it’s own standards. I feel as though legislature has probably not seen fit to reinforce it because the original ruling remains valid in that a doctor can follow all of the standards of care, and still be liable.
Generally, the power of attorney is expected to be used with great caution and only in exceptional circumstances because its grants extensive authority to an agent.
<h3>What is power of attorney?</h3>
This power is inferred in a a written document that confers express authority to agent and is usually notarized.
Hence, it is expected to be used with great caution and only in exceptional circumstances because its grants extensive authority to an agent.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about power of attorney
<em>brainly.com/question/20397360</em>
Answer:
C and A
Explanation:
the other 2 have no relation to forensics
