According to the geneva convention, 4.31 Incendiary weapons include any weapon or munition which is designed to set fire to obje
cts or to cause burn injury to humans through the action of flame, heat or a combination of the two caused by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on a target is illegal. So would the use of high-explosive incendiary/armor-piercing ammunition be illegal in war?
Explanation:Because in many cases militaries have used armor piercing rounds for bullet proof cars and incendiary ammo for buildings with weak structure it might be illegal for other cases but in war there is no limitation on power of arms unless if there general says other wise.
You mean the videogame, Well Code Black Lockdown is called when there has been a breach and control of a site has been lost, it specifically allows the use warheads or hydro bombs.
It has the effect of providing presidential support and the support of their political party in the senate. Judges are appointed for life and a president hopes any judges that he as appointed will carry forward his legacy.
