1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timofeeve [1]
3 years ago
5

According to the geneva convention, 4.31 Incendiary weapons include any weapon or munition which is designed to set fire to obje

cts or to cause burn injury to humans through the action of flame, heat or a combination of the two caused by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on a target is illegal. So would the use of high-explosive incendiary/armor-piercing ammunition be illegal in war?
Law
1 answer:
balu736 [363]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:No it would not

Explanation:Because in many cases militaries have used armor piercing rounds for bullet proof cars and incendiary ammo for buildings with weak structure it might be illegal for other cases but in war there is no limitation on power of arms unless if there general says other wise.

You might be interested in
If you brought something that had been stolen, would you think it fair for law enforcement officer to take the stolen article fr
Alborosie

Answer:

yes because it is not yours

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Can you buy me a bird
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

i would love to but im broke

Explanation:

good luck getting a bird

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
. cases involving injury or damage *
erik [133]

Answer:e

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The person granting another person to act on their behalf using a power of attorney is called a _______________.
Mashcka [7]

Answer: Principal

Explanation: A principal is a person who legally gives a power of attorney to another person to acts on his behalf.

The person called the agent can act legally on behalf of the principal in all capacity covered in the power of attorney.

A power of attorney (POA) is a legal document that allows a principal to appoint a person or organization (known as an agent ) to act on his behalf.

8 0
3 years ago
Rawls and Nozick both agree that : a)the law should embody no conception of the good life b)in the name of liberty the governmen
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice

Explanation:

Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.

They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.

According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.

Hence, the correct answer is d.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Of the following countries, which one is most likely to report the highest murder rate?
    9·2 answers
  • Statistics show that many crimes have been declining over the last decade. Why do you think we are seeing a decline in crime? Do
    6·1 answer
  • Alcohol abuse is intentional overuse.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    10·1 answer
  • Difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion
    9·1 answer
  • On my way to 69 questions &gt;:)<br> I DONT KNOW WHY IM USING 69 POINTS
    9·1 answer
  • A witness in a court case can never talk about the crime outside the courtroom.
    12·2 answers
  • List 2 powers of each legislature​
    14·2 answers
  • The role of Georgia’s executive branch is to operate departments and to __<br> halp plz
    11·1 answer
  • What does it mean to become a partner in a law firm.
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these statements is not true about grand jury proceedings?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!