According to the geneva convention, 4.31 Incendiary weapons include any weapon or munition which is designed to set fire to obje
cts or to cause burn injury to humans through the action of flame, heat or a combination of the two caused by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on a target is illegal. So would the use of high-explosive incendiary/armor-piercing ammunition be illegal in war?
Explanation:Because in many cases militaries have used armor piercing rounds for bullet proof cars and incendiary ammo for buildings with weak structure it might be illegal for other cases but in war there is no limitation on power of arms unless if there general says other wise.
and if they dong evidence that he stole u can also file for false accusation which can be used when a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts.
they are only called air Force one when the president is on board. if the vice president or any other senior offical is flying it is called air Force 2 otherwise it is called by it's number like any other airplane
