Complete Question:
1. Select the correct statement regarding relevant costs and revenues.
A. Sunk costs are not relevant for decision-making purposes.
B. Relevant costs are frequently called unavoidable costs.
C. Direct labor is an example of a unit-level cost.
D. Only variable costs are relevant for decision making.
Answer:
1. A
2. D
3. B
Explanation:
1. The correct statement regarding relevant costs and revenues is that sunk costs are not relevant for decision-making purposes. Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
2. Expected future revenues that differ among the alternatives under consideration are often referred to as differential revenues. It is the difference in revenues among two (2) alternatives, which would influence decision making.
3. The benefits sacrificed when one alternative is chosen over another are referred to as opportunity costs. It is also referred to as alternative forgone.
<em>For example, Tony gives up going to see a new movie at the cinema in order to prepare for an examination, so as to get a good grade</em>.
Protein folding is often described as a highly cooperative
process. This means that proteins tend to be
folded or unfolded without the presence of partially folded states.
<span>Proteins help build hormones, enzymes and other body muscles.
It is also the basic for blood, skin and bones etc. in human body.</span>
Answer:
C) None of the $5,000 should be included in gross income.
Explanation:
During 2016, Sarah's itemized deductions (other than the stolen silverware) were only $2,000. If Sarah wanted to deduct the stolen silverware, she could have taken a casualty loss = $6,000 - $100 - $3,000 = $2,900. Her total itemized deductions would equal $2,000 + $2,900 = $4,900.
But during that year, Sarah should have opted for a standard deduction of $6,300 which is higher than her itemized deductions. That means that Sarah didn't claim any deduction for her silverware, so any money received from the insurance company should not be included in her gross income.
It is a settlement agreement, where the defendant could pay the plaintiff an agreed amount to settle the dispute.