High emigration is NOT a reason that the population of the United States continues to grow.
Option E
<u>Explanation:</u>
In no case "high emigration" supports the population growth in United states because it is the process of leaving the country. When few people leaves United states for some how it can be considered as the reason for the increase in population growth of US.
The people coming into and leaving from the area known as net migration is the major cause for the increase in population of the United States. The advancement in medical technology reduced the death rate as a whole which in turn increases the population. The birth rate increased after WW-II which was denoted as "baby boom from 1940 till 1960" also increased the population growth. And also due to increase in population momentum the population increases.
At best it doesn't matter. If there are enough fish to go around in both locations, then the two areas can coexist.
If however, the two jurisdictions are going to be in competition with each other, then that's not good.
China's Output: 32.5 million tons = 32,500,000,000 pounds 32.5 billion pounds in 2004
Louisiana produced 1.2 billion pounds of sea food in 2005
Louisiana's output compared to China is quite small. I would guess most of it is for domestic use. It means that every man woman and child in the United States eats 3.64 pounds of fish a year. There won't be much left over for export. This does not take cat food into consideration. I cannot find exact statistics on sea creatures (like tune or salmon) that are put in cat food particularly (since they require meat) but it's going to cut down on what could be exported.
I don't think China has much of an effect on what happens in Louisiana.
Answer:
Dave's attire strategy likely indicates he is a high self-monitor.
Explanation:
High self-monitors are people who respond to social clues by adjusting themselves to those clues. That is, they present themselves differently in accordance to each individual situation. That includes not only their appearance, but also their behavior. It is common for high self-monitors to hold jobs that involve dealing with an audience or a large group of people - acting, diplomacy, and public relations, among others. Dave shows concern by how his appearance fits in with the situation. He is capable of adapting, adjusting, in a way that shows he is likely a high self-monitor.
It lets elected officials know how citizens wish them to act <span />
Answer:
depends on what it is about
Explanation:
