This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here is the complete question:
Nomadic societies negatively impact the environment more than industrial societies.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
True
False
The answer to this question is False
Explanation:
First human societies were nomadic, this means to obtain sources such as food, shelter, or water, groups moved from one area to another. This lifestyle had fewer negative effects on the environment in comparison to modern industrial societies. This is because industrial societies rely on exploiting natural resources and manufacturing processes to create new products. These two factors lead to the depletion of natural resources and the increase of pollution as chemicals are released as part of production, which does not occur in nomadism. In this context, industrial societies negatively impact the environment more than nomadic societies, therefore the statement is false.
Idk how about you look the question up on what's called the internet:)
The answer is a sweeping generalization. It is applying a
general rule to a specific occasion without appropriate evidence. While the
opposite of the sweeping generalization is hasty generalization is applying a
specific rule to a general situation without proper evidence.
Based on this given information, Brianna's anxiety issues, in a psychoanalytic view, may have been results of unresolved issues within her unconscious and the strive to seek validation. Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.