Answer:
The South seceded over states' rights. Confederate states did claim the right to secede, but no state claimed to be seceding for that right. In fact, Confederates opposed states' rights — that is, the right of Northern states not to support slavery.
he could've either made the slides more clear so there wouldn't be as many questions or he could've asked everyone to save their questions until the end. They could have written them down on post-it notes so they wouldn't forget the questions.
Explanation:
I think this had to do with slavery. Hikes!
A few states recognize the concept of community property, in which most everything is jointly owned and equally split between the parties. Massachusetts, however, is not one of those states. Massachusetts law requires the division of property in a divorce to be equitable.
Hope this helps you out!! :)
If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
