In the past, developmentalists believed that human intelligence is Static, whereas now it is commonly understood that intelligence is malleable.
Human intelligence:
- The capacity to learn from experience, adapt to novel circumstances, comprehend and manage abstract concepts, and apply information to influence one's surroundings are all components of human intelligence.
- Humans are cognitively capable of learning, forming concepts, understanding, applying logic and reason, as well as the capacities to recognize patterns, plan, innovate, solve problems, make decisions, retain information, and use language to communicate. These abilities are all a part of intelligence.
- Humans are often regarded as the most intellectual species on the planet; humans possess large brains that are superior to those of other animals in terms of processing speed and cognitive ability. In actuality, during millions of years of evolution, humans have demonstrated a tremendous growth in brain size and intelligence.
Learn more about human intelligence here brainly.com/question/16543469
#SPJ4
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer: C. and D.
Building codes are meant to protect public health and safety; these answers would make the most sense.
