California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and New Jersey
Answer:
4th amendment...
Explanation:
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies not only to the U.S. federal government, ...
Hope this helps
:D
goodbye
Answer:
This is an example of B. Stimulus enhancement.
Explanation:
Stimulus enhancement refers to the ability to <em>learn the relation between a stimulus and its consequences.</em> This is learnt by observing another individual or being carry a certain action out.
In this case, one dog starts sniffing for potential scraps of food; this action enhances the other dogs to copy the sniffing behavior, even in different areas.
In the carbon cycle, producers take in the following form of carbon from the atmosphere to perform photosynthesis:
B. CO2 ( Carbon Dioxide)
The true statement about the eyewitness testimony is that it is vulnerable to the power of suggestion.
<h3>What is a power of suggestion?</h3>
A power of suggestion refers to a situation where an individual has an idea conveyed to them and that such idea becomes reality.
Hence, the true statement about the eyewitness testimony is that it is vulnerable to the power of suggestion in the court.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about eyewitness testimony
<em>brainly.com/question/25031168</em>
