The answer is B. By covered wagon
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Kent
Explanation:Because Kent is underpaid he is more likely to experience burnout, while as Ahmed is sociable he gets more happy because he is considered important to keep others occupied and that cancels out little human contact while James cant take a break as the supervisor he has the ability to tell others to so something so he can take a little break
Hope this helped!
Answer:
<u><em>B: National Communication Association</em></u>
Explanation:
In social experiments Location, age of patient or test subject, time of day, and gender of either party can play a big role in results and when changed alter the results making them dependent.
