![\bf \qquad \qquad \textit{Future Value of an ordinary annuity} \\\\ A=pymnt\left[ \cfrac{\left( 1+\frac{r}{n} \right)^{nt}-1}{\frac{r}{n}} \right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20%5Ctextit%7BFuture%20Value%20of%20an%20ordinary%20annuity%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0AA%3Dpymnt%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cleft%28%201%2B%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7Bn%7D%20%5Cright%29%5E%7Bnt%7D-1%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7Bn%7D%7D%20%5Cright%5D)

![\bf A=5280\left[ \cfrac{\left( 1+\frac{0.06}{1} \right)^{1\cdot 4}-1}{\frac{0.06}{1}} \right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20A%3D5280%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cleft%28%201%2B%5Cfrac%7B0.06%7D%7B1%7D%20%5Cright%29%5E%7B1%5Ccdot%20%204%7D-1%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.06%7D%7B1%7D%7D%20%5Cright%5D)
Joe is making $485 payments monthly, but the amount gets interest on a yearly basis, not monthly, so the amount that yields interest is 485*12
also, keep in mind, we're assuming is compound interest, as opposed to simple interest
Answer:
<h2>Leah is actually wrong, because those rectangles are similar.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that similarity is about having proportional sides and congruent angles. When we have congruent sides, then those rectangles are congruent not similar.
In this case, to find the similarity, Leah should compare bases and heights thorugh division, because the ratio between heights and the ratio between bases must be equal. So, let's divide.


As you can observe, both ratios are equal.
Therefore, those rectangles are congruent.
It would be 15 greater than or equal to 14
The 4 in the first one is in the thousands place, the second one doesn't have a 4 and the 4 in the third one is in the hundreds place. Hope this helped.