People are willing to pay for a unit of a particular commodity is determined by Marginal utility.
Explanation:
Marginal utility (MU) is characterized as the additional utility obtained from the use of one additional unit of a good or service, or the increased use of an increased unit by an entity.
Economists use the idea of marginal utility to assess how much of an item consumers can purchase. Positive marginal utility happens when the consumption of an additional item increases the total utility, while negative marginal utility occurs when the consumption of an additional item reduces the total utility.
From this list, none are really the perfect solution to have a clear presentation but most likely it would be: C. Using a large font, since it will allow viewers from a long distance to be able to understand better.
Answer:
C, the board of directors of IFS
Explanation:
The board of the IFS is ultimately responsible for the corporate climate that resulted in the use of substandard ingredients in the meals meant for the troops.
This is because the directors are the ones at the helm of affairs and they decide what happens in the IFS. This means that at least one of the directors is aware of the use of substandard ingredients . It can be said that if one knows, all other know. This phrase convieniently indicts the directors.
Cheers.
Answer:
pat should drive if saving half an hour is worth $0.50 or more
Explanation:
Marginal cost is the additional cost generated by producing an additional unit of output.
Marginal cost of taking the bus = 1 / 2 = 0.50
Marginal utility is the additional utility derived from consuming one more unit of a good
Marginal utility per good = marginal utility / price of the good
Pat should take the action that would yield him the highest utility given the marginal cost
So,pat should drive if saving half an hour is worth $0.50 or more
Answer:
The correct answer is d. ethics.
Explanation:
Ethics is a systematic and critical analysis of morality, of the moral factors that guide human behavior in a given practice or society. As fishing represents an interaction between people and the aquatic ecosystem, fishing ethics refers to the values, rules, duties and virtues relevant to the well-being of people and the ecosystem, providing a critical normative analysis of the moral issues at stake. in that sector of human activities.
When moral values, rules and duties are subject to an ethical analysis, their relationship with the basic human interests shared by the population, regardless of their cultural environment, is particularly important. Moral values can change and moral reasoning asks whether activities legitimated traditionally and in practice by religion, law or politics deserve to be recognized. Indeed, the evolution of ethics in the last century has been characterized by the tendency to change values and overthrow the moral conventions that have guided relations between the sexes, between human beings and animals and between human beings and their environment. A more recent task of ethics is to offer resistance to these tendencies to globalization, commercialization and mastery of technology that erode biodiversity and valuable aspects of cultural identity and that could even threaten human rights. Although these trends are often presented as neutral in relation to values, they carry hidden hypotheses that are possible sources of inequality and abuse.
