The fundamental question in mcculloch v. maryland involved the ability of the U.S. government to pass laws not listed in the U.S. Constitution!
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819), was a decision by the U.S Supreme Court. The state of Maryland had attempted to halt operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the U.S. by imposing a tax on all money of banks not chartered in Maryland. The law applied to all banks not based in Maryland. This Second Bank was, in Maryland, was the only out-of-state bank then, so the law was specifically made for the Second Bank. Then Court created the "Necessary and Proper Clause" of the Constitution, which allowed the Federal government to pass laws not mentioned in the Constitution's powers. It was a go-around way from following the Constitution.
GOOD LUCK!!!! :)
The correct answer is legislature
Policy plans created to address a societal problem can be adopted by the <u>legislature</u>.
It depends on who the people of the United States vote as well as electoral college. Donald Trump is so far winning the republican polls and for the democratic it is close between Hillary Clinton and Berne Sanders.
I t is very difficult to find out a nation´s feeling towards a conflict which had many consequences, specially because this is a sensitive topic. The dicussion nowadays is focused on how can be interpreted the German role during WWI. And the discussion is around two specific concepts: guilt or responsibility. The German Nation is certainly a different one from that involved in WWI and WWII. This is the reason why it is reasonable to state that Germany is a nation aware of their history and willing to use the experience learnt in those events to educate new generations of conscious people regarding conflict.
I think it's health care but I could be wrong
