Answer:
Open forums for community engagement
Explanation:
Given that sustainability is mainly focused on economic, environmental, and social aspects, in terms of managing resources without affecting the future. Hence, it can be concluded that Durban, South Africa, efforts to pursue sustainability includes the following:
1. Food gardens are planted in schools: plants in gardens are natural means of environmental sustainability
2. Development of solar power for heating water: this is also a sustainable way of managing the environment instead of burning fuels
3. Increased recycling: recycling of used materials helps to manage natural resources 4. Development of bike lanes for transportation: this also helps reduce the level of absorbing pollution in the environment.
Therefore, in this case, the exception to the Durban effort is "Open forums for community engagement." This is because it does not affect sustaining the environment.
Answer:
The person who is honest to his work and who has strong moral principles and he follows those principles without failure.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Integrity, simply stated, is the ability to be fair in all situations. A person with integrity has strong moral values and ethics. Integrity forces a person to follow his values of honesty, loyalty and truth. Integrity also means to be complete and undivided, in both the physical and the mental stage.
When your values change from situation to situation, your integrity is lacking. A person who is having integrity is said as <em>that person who would do nothing that humiliate others.
</em>
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
An individual fact, item, or feature
