1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phantasy [73]
3 years ago
9

People who experience online harassment either ignore it or respond via postings or involving authorities Is one method more eff

ective than the other? A 2014 Pew Research Center report, based on a random sample of American adults, found that 412 of the 549 respondents who had chosen to ignore online harassment thought that it was an effective way to deal with the issue. Of the 368 respondents who had chosen to respond to online harassment, 305 thought that it had been effective A.
Required:
a. Is there good evidence that one approach is more likely to be effective than the other? State the null and alternative hypotheses, obtain the test statistic and P-value, and conclude in context.
b. How large is the difference? Obtain and interpret in context a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of American adults who find ignoring online harassment effective and those who find responding to it effective.
c. How effective is that best method? Obtain and interpret in context a 95% confidence interval for theproportion of American adults who find the best m ethod effective.
Mathematics
1 answer:
MA_775_DIABLO [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First method information:

Sample size  n₁  = 549

x₁ ( people ignoring on-line harassment )  =  412

Proportion of people ignoring on-line harassment  p₁

p₁ =  412/549   p₁  =  0,75   q₁ =  1  -  p₁    q₁ = 0,25

Second method ( people chosen to respond)

Sample size   n₂  =  368

number of people responding   x₂  = 305

Proportion of people responding

p₂ =  305/ 368    p₂ =  0,83   then  q₂  =  0,17

a) Looking for differences in the approachs

Hypothesis test:

Null Hypothesis                     H₀         p₁  =  p₂

Alternative Hypothesis         Hₐ         p₁  ≠  p₂

Alternative Hypothesis indicates that the test is a two-tail test

Choosing a confidence interval  CI = 95 % then a significance level is       α = 5%     α  = 0,05  and from z-table we get  z(c) =  1.64

To calculate z(s)

z(s)  =  (  p₁  -  p₂ ) / EED

EED = √  p₁*q₁)/n₁  +  (p₂*q₂)n₂

EED = √  (0,75*0,25)/549   +  0,83*0,17)/368

EED = √ 3,41 *10⁻⁴   +  3,83*10⁻⁴

EED =   10⁻² *√ 3,41 + 3,83

EED =   10⁻² * 2,69

EED = 0,0269

z(s)  =  (  p₁  -  p₂ )/0,0269

z(s)  = -  0,08 / 0,0269

z(s)  =  - 2,97

p-value for z(s)  is  pvalue  = 0,0015

Comparing  z(s)  and  z(c)   modules

z(s) > z(c)  therefor z(s) is in the rejection region we have to reject H₀ and claim that there is a difference between the proportions

b) How large is the difference

You might be interested in
What ratio forms a proportion with 2/3?<br> A. 2/4 B. 3/4 C. 4/6 D. 3/2
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

because you can simplify 4/6 by 2.

2 goes into 4 twice and then 2 goes into 6 3 times

2/3

3 0
2 years ago
Graph the function.
disa [49]

Answer:

Line passing through (0,2),(1,-21).

Step-by-step explanation:

y=-23x+2\\at\ y\ axis\ x=0\\y=-23\times0+2\\y=2

hence this line passes through (0,2).

When x=1

y=-23\times1+2\\y=-21

Hence this line passes through (1,-21).

Graph is attached.

3 0
4 years ago
A coin favors heads when tossed and there are 15 heads in 18 tosses
Alexxandr [17]
This is not correct.  You might think you are "on a roll" but the probability of heads on any toss is just as likely as the probability of tails because each coin toss is an independent event, meaning, two events related in such a way that knowing about the occurrence of one event has no effect on the probability of the the other event.  This would hold true if you have tossed these 15 heads and you believe that tails "are due".  It is an independent event.  
7 0
3 years ago
What is the value of m?<br> m3 = 64
uranmaximum [27]

Answer

m=4

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Solve 56 &gt; -7x <br> Thank you!
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

-8 > x

Step-by-step explanation:

56 divided by -7 = -8

-8 > x

make sure to double check before turning it in!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 3 times 5 hundreds in decimal form?
    13·1 answer
  • Which expression can be used to convert 100 USD to Japanese yen?
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME ASAP!
    15·2 answers
  • Square root of 81 minus square root of negative 48 answer in a + bi form
    6·1 answer
  • Identify the like terms.
    9·1 answer
  • Here is a question :D
    6·2 answers
  • A room with a length of 270 cm and width 150 cm is to be covered with square tiles .What is the largest size of tiles to be used
    5·1 answer
  • Which equation has (2,-6) and (-3,4) as solutions?
    12·1 answer
  • Find the volume of the pyramid with a square base, where the area of the base is 16.3ft and the height of the pyramid is 13.7ft
    11·1 answer
  • SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!