1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phantasy [73]
2 years ago
9

People who experience online harassment either ignore it or respond via postings or involving authorities Is one method more eff

ective than the other? A 2014 Pew Research Center report, based on a random sample of American adults, found that 412 of the 549 respondents who had chosen to ignore online harassment thought that it was an effective way to deal with the issue. Of the 368 respondents who had chosen to respond to online harassment, 305 thought that it had been effective A.
Required:
a. Is there good evidence that one approach is more likely to be effective than the other? State the null and alternative hypotheses, obtain the test statistic and P-value, and conclude in context.
b. How large is the difference? Obtain and interpret in context a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of American adults who find ignoring online harassment effective and those who find responding to it effective.
c. How effective is that best method? Obtain and interpret in context a 95% confidence interval for theproportion of American adults who find the best m ethod effective.
Mathematics
1 answer:
MA_775_DIABLO [31]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First method information:

Sample size  n₁  = 549

x₁ ( people ignoring on-line harassment )  =  412

Proportion of people ignoring on-line harassment  p₁

p₁ =  412/549   p₁  =  0,75   q₁ =  1  -  p₁    q₁ = 0,25

Second method ( people chosen to respond)

Sample size   n₂  =  368

number of people responding   x₂  = 305

Proportion of people responding

p₂ =  305/ 368    p₂ =  0,83   then  q₂  =  0,17

a) Looking for differences in the approachs

Hypothesis test:

Null Hypothesis                     H₀         p₁  =  p₂

Alternative Hypothesis         Hₐ         p₁  ≠  p₂

Alternative Hypothesis indicates that the test is a two-tail test

Choosing a confidence interval  CI = 95 % then a significance level is       α = 5%     α  = 0,05  and from z-table we get  z(c) =  1.64

To calculate z(s)

z(s)  =  (  p₁  -  p₂ ) / EED

EED = √  p₁*q₁)/n₁  +  (p₂*q₂)n₂

EED = √  (0,75*0,25)/549   +  0,83*0,17)/368

EED = √ 3,41 *10⁻⁴   +  3,83*10⁻⁴

EED =   10⁻² *√ 3,41 + 3,83

EED =   10⁻² * 2,69

EED = 0,0269

z(s)  =  (  p₁  -  p₂ )/0,0269

z(s)  = -  0,08 / 0,0269

z(s)  =  - 2,97

p-value for z(s)  is  pvalue  = 0,0015

Comparing  z(s)  and  z(c)   modules

z(s) > z(c)  therefor z(s) is in the rejection region we have to reject H₀ and claim that there is a difference between the proportions

b) How large is the difference

You might be interested in
Through: (-5, -3), perp. to y=-9/4x-5
Mrrafil [7]

Given:

A line passes through (-5,-3) and perpendicular to y=-\dfrac{9}{4}x-5.

To find:

The equation of the line.

Solution:

We have,

y=-\dfrac{9}{4}x-5

On comparing this equation with slope intercept form, i.e., y=mx+b, we get

m_2=-\dfrac{9}{4}

It means, slope of this line is -\dfrac{9}{4}.

Product of slopes of two perpendicular lines is always -1.

m_1\times m_2=-1

m_1 \times \left(-\dfrac{9}{4}\right)=-1

m_1=\dfrac{4}{9}

Slope of required line is \dfrac{4}{9} and it passes through the point (-5,-3). So, the equation of the line is

y-y_1=m(x-x_1)

where, m is slope.

y-(-3)=\dfrac{4}{9}(x-(-5))

y+3=\dfrac{4}{9}(x+5)

9(y+3)=4(x+5)

9y+27=4x+20

27-20=4x-9y

7=4x-9y

Therefore, the equation of required line is 4x-9y=7.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the answer to this problem?
valkas [14]

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

DEF=180

DE=120

180-120=60

i hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
It is the morning of the sandcastle-building competition at the beach. Dory has been looking forward to this event for months. A
zvonat [6]
One way is by comparing the weather for today as compared to the rest of the week or month.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who investigates civil rights violations and how are those violations tracked
laiz [17]
The FBI investigates civil right violations
6 0
3 years ago
Weekly salary: $650; earnings to date: $30,000.​
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

30000/650= 46.15 weeks to accumulate $30000

ss tax rate is 12.4%

Medicare rate is 0.09%

30,000*12.4%= $3720

30,000*9%= $270

Total is $3990

Per pay period is

650*12.4%= $80.60

650*9%=$58.50

Total is $139.10

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mikayla is a waitress who makes a guaranteed $50 per day in addition to tips of 20% of all her weekly customer receipts, t. She
    15·2 answers
  • What’s the answer to 5-y=18
    9·1 answer
  • Javier bought a 20 ounce smoothie that contains 450 total calories how many calories does this smoothie contain per ounce
    11·2 answers
  • Find the co-ordinates of the foot of the perpendicular drawn from the point (6, 3) to the line by
    12·1 answer
  • What is the scale factor and center of dilation for this problem
    7·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!!<br><br>Answer: ?​
    14·1 answer
  • The table of values represents a polynomial function.
    11·1 answer
  • Select all of the expressions that have a value of 18
    13·1 answer
  • Hi its my birthday!! please help me <br> I think it might be choice letter A or B ?? im stuck
    5·1 answer
  • IQ scores are normally distributed with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Using the empirical rule, what percentage
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!