Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.
The correct answer is A. During 2009 real GDP in Viloxia grew by 2 percent, which is about the same as average U.S. growth over the last one-hundred years.
Given that in 2009, the imaginary nation of Viloxia had a population of 5,000 and real GDP of 500,000, and in 2010 it had a population of 5,100 and real GDP of 520,200, to determine the growth of real GDP in Viloxia during 2009, the the following calculations must be made:
- Total GDP / population = real GDP
- 500,000 / 5000 = X
- 100 = X
- 520,200 / 5100 = X
- 102 = X
- 102 - 100 = 2
Therefore, during 2009 Viloxia's GDP grew by 2 percent, which is about the same as average U.S. growth over the last one-hundred years.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/4131508
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": ABC company.
Explanation:
Corporations and governments finance their activities by issuing stock or bonds which are <em>purchased by the public directly from the issuing corporation or government entity</em>. This is considered the primary market, which provides investors their first chance to purchase new security.
The answer is contingency design. It is the sum incorporated into a development spending plan to take care of extra expenses for conceivable outline changes. The measure of possibility fluctuates with the phases of outline. As the plan is finished, the possibility ought to be diminished to almost zero for most school ventures.
Answer:
This is a very unlikely situation, since the plant must be really large and the river probably didn't carry a lot of water in the first place. But even if this was possible, it would be illegal for a company to use 100% of the natural resources available. No law or regulation (municipal, state or federal) would allow such thing to happen and assuming it got to court, the court would rule against the company.
Since you need an environmental impact report before you start building a factory, then it would be unlikely that the factory or plant was legally authorized to operate in the first place. The only option is that they built a dam and that is highly regulated.
