Answer:
the maximum loan size is $1,278,335.62
Explanation:
The computation of the maximum loan size is as follows:
= (NOI first year ÷ debt coverage rate) × 1 ÷ (rate of interest) × (1 - 1 ÷ (1 + rate of interest)^number of years)
= ($150,000 ÷ 1.5) × 1 ÷ (6%) × (1 - 1 ÷ (1 + 6%)^(25))
= $1,278,335.62
hence, the maximum loan size is $1,278,335.62
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
Earnings per share = Net income/No of ordinary shares outstanding at the end of the year
Earnings per share = $290,000/240,000 shares
Earnings per share = $1.21
Therefore, Price-earnings ratio = Market price per share/Earnings per share
Price-earnings ratio = $70/1.21
Price-earnings ratio = 57.85
Explanation: First and foremost, there is need to calculate earnings per share by considering the net income and then divide it by the number of common stocks outstanding at the end of the year. Price-earnings ratio is obtained by dividing the market price per share by earnings per share.
Answer:
once you adopt an accounting principle or method, continue to follow it consistently in future accounting periods so that the results reported from period to period are comparable.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
As auditor, I may not agree with the policy that is been changed. It
is believed that, by default there is a normal loan risk that is been associated with the business of Pacific Bank. A way to help reduce this risk is to carefully asses the loan applications. Loans that are large has greater risk in the event of default compared to smaller loans. Therefore, it is reasonable to have more than several individual involved in decision making give a loan that is very big. In addition, loans should be given base on those that meet the requirements, it should not be on the base on favoritism or people with relationship with bank president. Giving the bank president the power to give huge loans may lead to him granting loans to people who he is familiar with, without the required due process been followed. This may cause the bank to be credit exposed risks that are poor.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because the injunction is the legal remedy that the special court's judge orders not the jury. The order enforce a party to do what must be done or refrains it from doing specific acts that harms the other party. So saying that Doorway sought the court injunction in which the jury decides the right course of action is incorrect because injunction is the warning of judge not of jury.
