According to Paul Farmer, an infectious disease physician and Harvard global health professor. The fact is that weak health systems not unprecedented virulence or a previously unknown mode of transmission, are to blame for Ebola's rapid spread.
But the fact is that weak health systems not unprecedented virulence or a previously unknown mode of transmission are to blame for Ebola's rapid spread. Weak health systems are also to blame for the high case-fatality rates in the current pandemic, which is caused by the Zaire strain of the virus.
Viral and epidemiologic data suggest that Ebola virus existed long before these recorded outbreaks occurred. Factors like population growth encroachment into forested areas and direct interaction with wildlife such as bushmeat consumption may have contributed to the spread of the Ebola virus.
Learn more about weak health systems here
brainly.com/question/24289862
#SPJ4
The correct answer is D. A breakthrough in one form of technology leads to a number of variations and technological developments.
Explanation:
In sociology, the evolutionary model of technological change is a theoretical perspective of technology in which technology evolves as one form of technology is created and this derives into multiple variations that lead to more advanced or complex technology. This was first developed by Philip Anderson and Michale Tushman in 1990 and is applied to the development of multiple technologies, for example, it is believed modern computer, cellphones, and similar devices derive from one main development. Considering this, the one that is a primary component of the evolutionary model fo technological change is a breakthrough in one form of technology leads to a number of variations and technological developments.
The answer is Hernán Cortés
Hope this helps
Have a great day/night
Answer:
Explanation:
Students of political systems grapple with a subject matter that is today in constant flux. They must deal not only with the major processes of growth, decay, and breakdown but also with a ceaseless ferment of adaptation and adjustment. The magnitude and variety of the changes that occurred in the world’s political systems beginning in the early 20th century suggest the dimensions of the problem. Great empires disintegrated; nation-states emerged, flourished briefly, and then vanished; world wars twice transformed the international system; new ideologies swept the world and shook established groups from power; all but a few countries experienced at least one revolution and many countries two or more; domestic politics in every system were contorted by social strife and economic crisis; and everywhere the nature of political life was changed by novel forms of political activity, new means of mass communication, the enlargement of popular participation in politics, the rise of new political issues, the extension of the scope of governmental activity, the threat of nuclear war, and innumerable other social, economic, and technical developments.
hope it helps :)
