Answer:
There is a positive linear relationship between the frequency of advertising and the sales of the advertised product.
Explanation:
A linear relationship is stablished between 2 quantitative variables that have constant proportionality. In this case, the variables are directly proportional to eachother as they move in the same direction. In addition, they are both increasing. So, we can conclude these variables have a positive linear relationship.
It should be noted that When calculating the cost of direct materials on the Schedule of Costs of Goods Manufactured,
The cost of indirect materials must be Subtracted from raw materials used in production.
<h3>What are Direct material costs ?</h3>
Direct material costs can be regarded as those cost of the raw materials as well as those components used in making the product.
Therefore, the cost of indirect material is required to be Subtracted from raw materials used in production.
learn more about Direct material cost at:
brainly.com/question/25790358
In the context of innovation streams,design competition is the concept that the given scenario best illustrates.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
When similar products are sold by many different companies there lies a rivalry between the companies which is called as competition. The main aim of all the business is to gain profit and market share. The development of the marketing strategy is mainly based on the competition that exists in the market for a product. The competition that exists with the design of the products refers to the design competition.
Innovations play a major role in the Design Competition. In the given scenario, the company Mozbert advertises for its wireless headsets with the ease of its usage and the difference from the wired headsets. Beloway, another wired headset manufacturer defends himself by giving some offers and discount for retaining his customers. Thus this is explains the concept called design competition, as the competition lies between the wired and wireless headsets.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The first part was true. A higher WACC results in a lower NPV simply because a higher discount rate results in a lower present value.
E.g. 100 / (1 + 6%)³ = 83.96, but if we increase r to 10%, then 100 / (1 + 10%)³ = 75.13
The second part is wrong because under the IRR method, the decision rule is very simple, all projects are accepted if their IRR is higher than the project's WACC (or discount rate). I.e. if hte project's WACC increases, so does the chance of the project being rejected because the IRR might be lower than the WACC.
Answer:
The formula for each month is described below:
January +(B2*31*C2)+(B2*$A$12)
February +(B2*29*C2)+(B2*$A$12)
March +(B2*31*C2)+(B2*$A$12)
April +(B4*30*C4)+(B4*$A$12)
May +(B3*31*C3)+(B3*$A$12)
Explanation:
The formula matches the requirements for each individual month as number of days change accordingly and $A$12 determines the fixed transport cost the other variables are the number of boxes and the cost per box.
